中国知识产权保护社会满意度3连增的背后 |双语IP，提供重要参考。

方舟

[size=1em]69.43分的背后是什么？

　　2012年，中国首次开展知识产权保护社会满意度调查，得分63.69；2013年满意度提高了1.27分，得分64.96；2014年满意度提高了4.47分，得分69.43。近日，由中国专利保护协会、中华商标协会、中国版权协会联合北京美兰德信息公司开展的2014年知识产权保护社会满意度调查给出了最新报告：中国知识产权保护社会满意度调查连续3年持续增长。那么，在不断增长的数据背后，什么起到了推动作用？

　　调查报告显示，2014年中国知识产权保护社会满意度调查沿用了以法律与政策保护、执法、管理与服务、宣传教育4项一级指标为框架、包含12项二级指标和40项三级指标的评价指标体系。与此同时，在全国满意度指标体系基础上，针对地方实际构建了评价地方知识产权保护工作的28项三级指标。从四个一级指标来看，调查结果对知识产权管理与服务、宣传教育工作的评价相对较高，这两项一级指标得分有较大提升，对执法工作的评价仍然相对偏低。但值得注意的是，今年执法工作的满意度得分为65.81，第一次突破了及格线，较前两年有较大幅度的进步。

　　“中国在加强立法的同时，也不断加强行政执法工作。自全国开展打击侵犯知识产权和制售假冒伪劣商品工作以来，各知识产权行政、司法部门都加大了对侵权行为的查处力度。同时，国家进一步强调加强知识产权保护和运用，在北京、上海、广州3地设立知识产权专门法院，政府一系列措施让社会各界对知识产权执法工作有了信心。”中国科学院大学法律与知识产权系主任李顺德表示。

　　近年来，在中国，知识产权系统不断加强执法队伍建设，全面开展专利行政执法协作，持续深化维权援助与举报投诉，做了大量富有成效的工作，取得了显著成绩。2014年，知识产权系统专利行政执法办案总量2.4479万件，同比增长50.9%；调处专利纠纷8220件，同比增长62.6%；“12330” 覆盖面积进一步扩大，维权援助中心建设进一步加强；持续开展社会满意度调查，调查结果已被纳入中国打击侵犯知识产权和制售假冒伪劣商品工作绩效评价指标体系，为相关部门了解知识产权保护状况、加强知识产权保护关键环节工作提供重要参考。

　　此外，调查报告还对中国符合分析要求的27个省区市知识产权保护总体情况进行了分析，满意度均在及格线以上。各省区市排名中，江西、山东、天津位居前三，广东、浙江、云南居后三位。与2013年相比，江西、山东、重庆、江苏、湖北、湖南、北京等7省市的得分排名提高了11位。调查显示，地方政府对知识产权保护工作的落实情况的满意度调查较去年提高了6.23分，具体体现在地方政府对知识产权保护工作的重视程度（提高6.34分）和地方对国家知识产权相关政策的落实情况（提高6.12分）。

　　“地方知识产权保护水平的提高可以说是各方努力的结果，这离不开国家层面和地方政府对知识产权的重视。近几年来，不论是从宏观上的知识产权政策指导、战略布局，还是具体到专利法、著作权法等知识产权法律的修改，以及实践中正在如火如荼开展的知识产权管理体制和审判体制的试点改革，都说明国家对知识产权的保护越来越重视，投入的力度也越来越大。国家层面的推进，使地方政府更加了解当地经济发展状况和知识产权保护工作重点，只有中央和地方双方积极结合起来，才能帮助地方创新更快发展。”中南大学知识产权研究院执行院长何炼红表示。

China’s social satisfaction on IPR protection grows for 3 years

　　In 2012, China’s first IPR protection social satisfaction survey was carried out, scoring 63.69; in 2013, the satisfaction improved 1.27 points, scoring 64.96; in 2014, the satisfaction improved 4.47 points, scoring 69.43. In recent annual report jointly carried out by China Patent Protection Association, China Trademark Association, China Copyright Association and Beijing Meilande Information Company on social satisfaction survey of intellectual property protection  shows: protection of intellectual property community satisfaction has a 3 consecutive years’ growth. So, behind the growing data, what played the great role in it?

　　In the report, 2014 Annual Social Protection of Intellectual Property satisfaction survey follows the framework of 4 first-level indicators: legal and policy protection, law enforcement, management and services, education; the evaluation index system includes 12 second-level indicators and 40 third-level indicators. For the 4 first-level indicators, the scores of intellectual property management and services, publicity and education is relatively high, these two scores of indicators have greatly improved, while the score of law enforcement is still relatively low. It is worth noting that this year’s enforcement satisfaction score of 65.81, the first time to break through the pass line, compared with two years ago has more substantial progress.

　　“Our country is not only strengthening legislation, but also continues to strengthen the administrative enforcement. While the nation further stressed that strengthening of intellectual property protection and utilization, including the establishment of specialized IP courts in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou.” The Director of Department of Law and Intellectual Property Rights of the University of Chinese Academy of SciencesLi Shunde said.

　　In recent years, the State Intellectual Property Office continued the strengthening of law enforcement system. In 2014, the total national intellectual property system has investigated 24,479 cases, an increase of 50.9%; mediated 8,220 patent disputes, an increase of 62.6%; “12330” hotline service further expanded the coverage, more IP protection and assistance centers were set up; the community satisfaction survey results have provided an important reference for the relevant departments to understand the situation and strengthen IPR protection.

　　In addition, the survey also analyzes the overall intellectual property protection of 27 provinces in line with the country requirements and the satisfaction are all  above the passing line. In the ranking of provinces, regions and municipalities, Jiangxi, Shandong, Tianjin are top three; Guangdong, Zhejiang, Yunnan, ranking the last three. Compared with 2013, the ranking score of 7 provinces, Jiangxi, Shandong, Chongqing, Jiangsu, Hubei, Hunan, Beijing, improved 11　place. Survey shows satisfaction with local government implementation of IPR protection improved 6.23 points compared with last year, for local government’s stress on intellectual property protection level （increase 6.34 points） and local government’s implementation on IP policy （increase 6.12 points）。

　　“In local area, the improvement on IPR protection can be considered as the result of efforts of all parties, which is inseparable from national and local government’s stress on intellectual property. This indicated that nation is paying more and more attention and taking more and more efforts to the protection of intellectual property rights. Promotion by national level enabled local governments a better understanding of the local economic development and intellectual property protection priorities, only the central and local government actively combine can help faster the development of local innovation.” the Executive President of Intellectual Property Institute, Central South University,He Lianhong said.